After
completion of the human genome sequencing and determination of its size, there
is a great demand for similar information about the human proteome as proteins mediate
almost all processes in a cell. To better understand the functionality of
proteins, we need the information about their activity that is directly linked
to their abundance. However, the situation is not simple here because of the
complexity of proteins themselves. This complexity may arise from allelicvariations, alternative splicing of RNA transcripts, and post-translational
modifications. All these cellular events create distinct protein molecules,
proteoforms/protein species, that modulate a wide variety of biological
processes.
Showing posts with label journal of proteomics research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journal of proteomics research. Show all posts
Monday, 24 April 2017
Zipf’s Law in Proteomics
Wednesday, 28 September 2016
Optimizing Urine Processing Protocols for Protein and Metabolite Detection
There is significant interest in studying
urine proteins and metabolites as potential biomarkers for clinical diseases.
Urine serves as an easily accessible biologic fluid that can be accessed usingnoninvasive methods. Urine is proximate to the bladder wall, and also contains
renally-cleared systemic compounds and metabolites. Thus urinary biomarkers may
be helpful in distinguishing pathologic versus normal biologic processes for
renal, genitourinary, and other medical conditions.
In clinically obtained urine samples,
multiple factors may introduce variability and affect the predictive value of
urine protein and metabolite data. In general, normal (non-proteinuric) urine
has low quantities of protein. Some would argue that 1st morning voids,
containing the highest protein concentrations, are helpful for proteomic
studies. However, logistically there is an obligate time delay when study
participants collect their 1st morning void, and factors such as time at room
temperature, ongoing protease activity, or bacterial contamination from
urethral microbes may affect data quality. Thus prior studies have suggestedcollecting the 2nd morning or other random “spot” urine. However, it remains
unclear if the addition of protease inhibitors or bacteriostatic agents may
preserve proteins and metabolites in 1st morning samples and facilitate their
use. This is relevant since urinary proteomic studies require maximal
concentrations of protein from urine with minimal loss.
Saturday, 24 September 2016
Characterization of the Venom Proteome for the Wandering Spider, Ctenus hibernalis (Aranea: Ctenidae)
Spider venoms are a multicomponent mixture
of polypeptides that contain a diverse array of structure and function that is
used for both the immobilization of prey as well as a defense mechanism. To
date, the venom composition of less than 100 of the nearly 40,000 characterized
species of spiders has been investigated. Although certain venom protein
families are highly conserved across spider taxa, there are several instances
of novel taxa-specific venom proteins, such as latrotoxins in Latrodectus,
Sphyngomyelinase D in Loxosceles, and μ-ctenitoxin-Pn1a in Phoneutria. Spidervenom has been shown to have several therapeutic applications due to the vastarray of biological functionality such as neurotoxic, antimicrobial,
antiparasitic, cytolytic, hemolytic, and antiarrhythmic activities; it is thus
likely that undiscovered peptides of novel importance are likely to be found in
previously unexplored venoms.
Spiders in the Ctenidae family, a group
containing nearly 500 species in 42 genera that range mostly in tropical
terrains, is home to the most venomous spider in the world Phoneutrianigriventer, and a nonlethal spider that has become the model species for
arachnological studies on evolution and development Cuppienius salei; both of
which are South American spiders whose venom has been highly studied.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
